http://kiwi6.com/file/y224vm9rhg
http://www.mediafire.com/?ch6kkxkz8rpkia5
Pt 1: 2010 Green Party Governor Californian Candidate - Laura Wells
Pt 2: Nance Parry - makes a living as a writer, had a professional acting career for fourteen years. It ended when she had three sexual harassment lawsuits - she sued her employer (a television network), the actor's union, and the harasser (a Stage Manager on a popular soap opera) - and won all three suits. It taught her a great deal about the law, where sexual harassment is concerned, as well as - to quote the title - how to avoid, handle and litigate over sexual harassment - IF and when necessary
Hi my good buddy, Preznit Change-O: I'm getting a bit confused here. Please explain and help me out. I know you claim the "right" and power to murder anyone in the world. I know you're dying to make America safe by killing whoever you want with none of that pesky need for trials or evidence or the 5th amendment. I know you're only trying to destroy whoever you want because they're such bad people. But I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this horribly impolite and not-safe-for work editorial by Arther Sibler who points out that your up coming 2012 re-election campaign pits you as being less dangerous to us, the American people, than whoever the Republicans put up against us. OK; at least that view makes some sense. But I'm having trouble with this cognitive dissonance: Here you are coming off a war for regime change in Libya - which you argue doesn't rise to actual "hostilities" - because THEIR fearless leader wants to kill Libyans to "protect them" - all while killing Americans when you want to "protect us." without interference by nasty technicalities like a 5th Amendment? Huh? WTF?
No comments:
Post a Comment